| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. [Rhea] New Wormhole Systems + Thera - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I am really looking forward to setting up a base of operations in onr of the frig holes and exploring out from there. I am also really enjoying the demonstrated lack of imagination from those that think frig only wh are problematic.
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.11.15 05:10:57
|
2. Phoebe: A new kind of exploration site - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
PIRJANIN wrote: CCP SoniClover wrote: Thanks for the feedback so far. We're making adjustments to the small site as we speak, these should be out in Sisi tomorrow. Some of the things we're adjusting: - Allowing MWDs - Disallowing warping dir...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.11.05 20:02:28
|
3. Phoebe: A new kind of exploration site - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Disclaimer: I have yet to do these sites. I like the premise of these sites thus far. Good feedback on there development. I wish to add a couple ideas for the next iteration to expand the choices players can make (for fitting and cargo space and ...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.11.05 18:00:17
|
4. Phoebe: A new kind of exploration site - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My turn to have forum issues it seems. Double post.
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.11.04 16:41:37
|
5. Phoebe: A new kind of exploration site - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Any Name wrote: What is the point of making the site harder to scan down, unless the ship inside it is harder to scan down? This makes it harder for Explorers, but easier for Exploders to combat-scan those Explorers down. Just wondered why it ...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.11.04 16:41:10
|
6. Phoebe: A new kind of exploration site - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Double post
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.11.04 16:06:14
|
7. Phoebe: A new kind of exploration site - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Do NOT make a site easier to scan down. Please. Make it hard and on occasion really worth the effort.
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.11.04 16:05:32
|
8. Blighted weaponry (affectionately known as glass cannons) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think I understand what CCP is trying to do and I would suggest that this is a trial balloon being floated to gauge reaction. Thus far reaction in underwhelming. I have an idea that I think can be iterated on and made worthwhile as an addition ...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.10.25 19:22:47
|
9. Sticky:[Crius] Industry Landscape feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Grenn Putubi wrote: I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but a quick search of the forums didn't come up with anything. I'm also not sure if this is the right thread to ask about this in, but I'll do it anyhow: Is the 10% NPC tax for ma...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2014.07.11 15:03:00
|
10. Siphon unit now useless - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Desert Ice78 wrote: I couldn't find a siphon feedback thread so I'm posting here. Just spent the day messing about with siphons and here are my thoughts: Hopelessly unbalanced. It takes 4 siphon unit to completely shut down production at a mo...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.11.12 05:00:00
|
11. Mobile Depot - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Not sure but I think this thing is meant to be a tent not a motor home. If you need bays and clones get a Roqual alt.
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.11.12 04:55:00
|
12. [Rubicon] T3 Subsystem re-fitting in space - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
During the battle of Midway the Japanese planes were caught on the carrier decks by American attackers. The Japanese commander could not decide what combat layout was required prior to the counter attack... T3 fleet cynos into system an attacks. ...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.11.06 09:31:00
|
13. Siphon unit now useless - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
hmmm. Seems to me that there might be a business opportunity here that folks are missing; something to supplement their pre-siphon income. For example, make arrangements with a tower(s) owner(s) to not get killed by the POS and regularly (weekly ...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.11.05 18:33:00
|
14. Mobile Depot Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please make them tough to scan.
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.11.05 01:14:00
|
15. Stratios Feedback, CPU issues, intended? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Vaju Enki wrote: It should have much less CPU. Why?
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.11.05 01:12:00
|
16. [Rubicon] T3 Subsystem re-fitting in space - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This is terrific news. I can expand upon my nomadic lifestyle until I either run out of ammo or become full from exploration loot. Many thanks. Who knows, T3s might become more commonplace and cheaper. As it stands, T3s will still be a better choi...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.11.05 01:08:00
|
17. Sticky:Feedback for Hacking/Archaeology feature from 27/5/13 onward - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I do not care for the mini game but I can live with it. Although I do well solo with the loot spew mechanic, the spew for successful hack, is downright awful. It was bad when on SiSi for the first time and is still bad. Please remove the loot spew.
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.11.04 15:31:00
|
18. Sticky:[Rubicon] Ghost Sites & Ascendancy Implant Set - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Affinity wrote: Yes, these sites will not always be available and they are fast paced in and out, no nonsense sites that trigger a timer the second the first capsuleer warps to them. I am reading the opinions on here about removing the site...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.10.25 19:57:00
|
19. Sticky:[Rubicon] Ghost Sites & Ascendancy Implant Set - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Affinity wrote: Alex Tutuola wrote: Kurtz wrote: Since these sites are to be located in all areas. Please consider changing the Ghost sites to require probing them out in order to warp to them. The rewards seem to have value. I th...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.10.25 18:50:00
|
20. Sticky:[Rubicon] Ghost Sites & Ascendancy Implant Set - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Affinity wrote: Abdiel Kavash wrote: CCP Affinity wrote: What are Ghost Sites? Ghost sites are a new, rare type of cosmic anomaly Does this mean they will only require the on-board scanner to find, and won't need to be probed down?...
- by Tzar Sinak - at 2013.10.25 18:46:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |